In my mind, the measuring tool for value input always gives associative results. In mose cases it works fine. But today I find that non-associative result is also possible.
This makes me greatly concerned about the use of measuring tool for value input. Your suggestion would be highly appreciated!
![Fig.1 The 1st point (10, 30, 0).]( "ScreenClip.png")
Fig.1 The 1st point (10, 30, 0).![Fig.2 Building a 2nd point by offsetting the Origin.]( "ScreenClip [1].png")
Fig.2 Building a 2nd point by offsetting the Origin.![Fig.3 Offsetting distance comes from measuring the height of the 1st point.]( "ScreenClip [6].png")
Fig.3 Offsetting distance comes from measuring the height of the 1st point.![Fig.4 In the Distance box, value "30.0000" has a ruler icon on its right. OK to finish buiding the 2nd point.]( "ScreenClip [3].png")
Fig.4 In the Distance box, value "30.0000" has a ruler icon on its right. OK to finish buiding the 2nd point.![Fig.5 But the new expression "p3_distance" is not a "Measurement"! Apparently the 2nd point is NOT associated to the 1st point.]( "ScreenClip [4].png")
Fig.5 But the new expression "p3_distance" is not a "Measurement"! Apparently the 2nd point is NOT associated to the 1st point.![Fig.6 In my past experience, values from measuring tool should looks like this. They are associated to the measured objects.]( "ScreenClip [5].png")
Fig.6 In my past experience, values from measuring tool should looks like this. They are associated to the measured objects.
